One of the reasons I strongly object to MR being labeled as the "worst" Bond film is that title implies (to me) shoddy craftsmanship and general lack of effort of everyone involved. Quite the opposite is true in MR as it's the biggest and most impressive looking Bond of all. The story and writing is rock solid too, although very similar to Lewis Gilbert's previous two Bonds.
The fans who don't like Moonraker object that it's literally and figuratively "not on this planet". I think that's a fair enough reason to not like it.
Even as much as I love MR, it has its flaws and that's its overindulgence at times - something that quite a few of the big Bond films suffer from. TSWLM IMO is the only which doesn't.
In the analysis of all the members rankings Moonraker was the 17th ranked film and its most common ranking was 11. For all the crap it gets, it doesn't perform that badly. http://www.ajb007.co.uk/topic/48909/ult … e-to-2017/
The films I can't figure out why others really hate is QoS and TWINE.